tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2841345611816946806.post2637589815946791954..comments2019-11-18T03:16:05.841-07:00Comments on Photography by Derek Miller: New Camera this YearDerek Millerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05713119096695631422noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2841345611816946806.post-48381730373110793202018-07-09T12:42:16.167-06:002018-07-09T12:42:16.167-06:00I wrote a lengthy comparison with lots photos here...I wrote a lengthy comparison with lots photos here: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/6-pentax-dslr-discussion/353089-ks-1s-0s-my-journey-k1000-k10d-k-1-lots-photos.html<br /><br />But to summarize tech differences, the K10D is one of the last cameras in the industry to use a CCD sensor (645D also uses a CCD sensor). This sensor is unbeatable at ISO 100. The K10D provides me with noise-free, clean blue skies at that ISO. The advantage of a CMOS sensor is less noise at higher ISOs, but there are trade-offs, such as a small amount of noise at ISO 100 with a CMOS sensor.Derek Millerhttp://www.derekmillerphotos.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2841345611816946806.post-36040280294171602892017-12-21T09:29:30.858-07:002017-12-21T09:29:30.858-07:00Here via Pentax Forums.
I'd like to know, out...Here via Pentax Forums.<br /><br />I'd like to know, out of curiosity, in exactly what way you feel the K10D beats out cameras of the K-5 and K-3 tech lines. I had an *istDL until it died & was replaced by the K-5, and then more recently I bought an *istDS for the analogue TTL capability and use it frequently, so your perspective would be interesting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com